Nestle to launch Fair Trade Coffee?

The Fairtrade Foundation has just announced that it has given a fairtrade label to a new line of Nestle coffee (Nescafe Partners Blend). This is a betrayal of the principles of fairtrade principles, set up over the last 20 years to stop the marginalisation of small-scale farmers, to guarantee fair prices for products, and to support democratic control by producers over their products. For Nestle this is a cheap public relations trip to undermine the Nestle boycott – the biggest consumer boycott of any single product in the UK. For the Fairtrade Foundation, it undermines its reputation and will undoubtedly damage the success of fairtrade. Problems with Nestle obtaining a fair trade label: * Nestle has recently been found the ‘least responsible’ global corporation, subject to a boycott from for its aggressive marketing of baby milk formula which leads the deaths of millions infants in places where water is unsafe. See Baby Milk Action for more info: http://www.babymilkaction.org. * Fairtrade aims to end the marginalisation of small-scale farmers in response to the corporatisation of the global food supply. Large corporations like Nestle have driven farmers across the world out of business with savage supplier relations. Farmers are replaced with plantation workers, slaving in poor conditions for a pittance. Nestle is still pursuing these tactics with all of its other coffee brands, and as such is the antithesis of fairtrade. Its fairtrade label does not signify a change of heart but a brutal marketing strategy to rescue Nescafe from its boycott image. * Fairtrade should be against corporate dominance, and in favour of a different more sustainable way of producing and trading, where all profits go back to communities rather than into the pockets of Western shareholders. * Even if corporations guarantee workers a fair price for their labour, they still have the power to drive currently existing fairtrade cooperatives out of business because of their enormous influence over marketing and placing. * This announcement comes in the same month trade unionists in the Philippines mourn the death of the leader of a protest at the Nestle factory, who was assassinated; as trade unionists from Colombia gather in Switzerland to present evidence of Nestle's links to paramilitaries; and as a campaign is launched in the US over its alleged "involvement in the trafficking, torture, and forced labor of children who cultivate and harvest cocoa beans". * The system seems designed to continue the dependence on Third World producers as providers of cheaper commodities to the First World, as all the processing, it seems, will continue to be done elsewhere. The Fairtrade Foundation quotes the case of Salvadorian coffee farmers who benefit from Nestle’s new product line: “in 2000 they were being offered just 45 cents per pound of coffee by local traders. They could not recoup the cost of producing their own crop and experienced severe hardship, resulting in some having to abandon their own farms to become hired labourers for larger farm owners.� This completely ignores the fact that it was Nestle, and companies like it, which drove down coffee prices, and continue to do this in all their other product lines. ------------------------ Protesters call to take action, by Email or in writing to the Head of the Fairtrade Foundation Harriet Lamb. Two sample letters are below, but feel free to adapt. Harriet.Lamb@fairtrade.org.uk The Fairtrade Foundation Room 204 16 Baldwin's Gardens London EC1N 7RJ ----------- sample email: Dear Harriet I am deeply disappointed with the Fairtrade Foundation’s recent decision to grant a Nestle product line fairtrade status. I believe that this is a betrayal of the principles of fairtrade, which I have supported for a long time now. I believe this decision undermines the principles of fairtrade, and will also undermine your reputation. I myself no longer feel able to trust your label, and will have to be more discerning in future. Yours, ___________________ Dear Ms Lamb, I was distressed and disappointed to hear that your organisation has granted a fairtrade label to Nestle for one of it's brands of coffee. Even if this particular product may be purchased according to fair trade principals (which seems likely to be a cynical marketing ploy, and a misuse of the reputation of your organisation), Nestle as a global corporation is highly irresponsible and has behaved reprehensibly in many areas of the world, in regards to coffee no less than with baby milk. I have for some years purchased fair trade products wherever possible, but this news makes me doubt the integrity of your certification process, and I sincerely hope that it can be reexamined. Yours sincerely,

Comments

original picture

Hey guy is it posible to send me the original photo please? It's me !!! my adress: zamal85@hotmail.fr

Is this the death of 'fairtrade'?

Now that multinationals like nestle and starbucks, and big-supermarkets are coopting the ideology of 'fairtrade', maybe this reform of capitalism is showing its impotence? It was always a proposed market solution to problems inherant in market economies, and as such was never a long term resolution of trade injustice. Perhaps the focus of 'fairtrade' activists should turn to the fundamental changes to our economies that are neccessary to bring about *real* fair trade. The next question then, is whether 'fairtrade' has increased the political consciousness of individuals, and brought us closer to the necessary and fundamental changes for our global economy, or whether it has encouraged complacency. If it has encouraged complacency, then 'fairtrade' is not only dead, but has been counter-productive, and has strengthened capitalist structures, which are inherrantly unjust.

Re: Nestle to launch Fair Trade Coffee?

there are two sides to the coin. 1) it's good that Fair Trade and consumer awareness are growing. The fact that a monstrous conglomerate like Nestle with all its greedyness signs up for Fair Trade shows how powerful FT has gotten. Pleased with that. 2) one policy does not make a company ethical. 3) while there is the potential for the Fair Trade Labeling Organisation (FLO) to be damaged by its affiliation with Nestle is FT spread further. my personl opinion is that I will continue to boycot the purchase of anything that's affiliated with Nestle but at the same time use them to boost our point (i.e.: 'if Nestle supports FT then all its products should be FT.' and 'if Nestle is going FT - what's with the other companies?') Another problem is how to classify a company to be worth or acceptable for FT and which not. The line is fine... (i.e. green&blacks (organic and part FT chocolate makers) selling their company to Cadbury Sweppes....) as long as the FLO and FT are not getting corrupted by big money like the 'Rainforest Alliance' or the 'Smithsonian Bird Watch' logo we should be safe... think positive. nestle is losing and they know it. its the same with all those oil companies who're now running full page adds about renewable energy in the NYT, FT and Newsweek. They're scared....

Syndicate

Syndicate content Features

Syndicate content Newswire