A post which appeared on Scotland Indymedia entitled “Open letter from Glasgow Women's Activist Forum to Occupy Glasgow” is the latest addition to an increasing number of articles which draw attention to incidences of sexual assault and harassment experienced by women participating in the Occupy protests around the world (1)
In the letter, Glasgow Women Activist's Forum state that “We, the undersigned, are writing to those involved in the Occupy Glasgow protest because our voices have hitherto been marginalised and our concerns systematically ignored in the days following the rape that occurred at the protest on Tuesday.”
This is a message that is being echoed on blogs and websites across the world in response to an alarming number of attacks on women. In Glasgow, Scotland, a woman was raped in the tent she was spending the night in at an occupy protest taking place George Square. In the U.S.A women in Cleveland, Dallas, Kansas and Portland have also been raped while participating in occupy protests. On the 10th of October a man was arrested at Occupy Wall Street for groping a woman, while at the Occupy Denver protest, a man was arrested for groping a reporter (2).
But perhaps more disturbing are the misogynist responses to these attacks from some protesters themselves. As Danielle Binks writes “what really makes a mockery of the Occupy movement is the response to these claims of sexual abuse amongst the protestors. When news broke of the Cleveland rape claim, one protestor even queried whether the abused woman was a ‘plant’, attempting to discredit the rally.”
“Occupy Baltimore released a ‘security statement’ pamphlet to their protestors which discouraged police involvement if any such crimes were committed. The Baltimore occupiers were heavily criticized for this ‘speak no evil’ stance, and have since revised their policies.”(3)
The recurring description of the women who have been attacked as “transient, run-aways, or homeless women” in drawing attention to their social status, is the suggestion being made that lower class women are less deserving of justice?) as well as the distancing of occupy protesters from them (claims that these women “were not part of the protest”) serves only to perpetuate inequality, the very thing the movement claims to be fighting against.
On blogs women are asking the question “Are Women Safe at Occupy Protests?” In her blog Lola-at-large comments “It’s a fair question to ask, considering the continuous reports of rape and sexual assault, as well as sexual harassment coming from the Occupy protests. Rapes and sexual assaults are happening, 12 by my latest count, with the movement barely six weeks old. That’s a pretty abysmal track record.” (4)
In another article People of Colour Organise points out that it is not only women who are confronting safety issues (5)
“A lot of women, queers, and trans people—along with many people of color and undocumented immigrants—do not feel comfortable sleeping in an open space with a lot of men, surrounded by police. Police presence ensures that protestors could, at any time, be risking arrest; and a racist police system ensures that people of color will be targeted. Unrestricted male presence in all sleeping areas ensures that protestors could, at any time, be exposing themselves to molestation and/or rape; and patriarchy ensures that women, queers, and trans people will be targeted.”
The presence of Julian Assange, a man facing allegations of rape and sexual violence, at an Occupy London rally, furthur reinforces that age old tendency to put women's issues to one side in the name of so-called social justice “When will we start to understand that any movement which asks women to put up with sexism as a sacrifice for the group, as if sexism isn't part of the problem, is doomed to fail? It's no accident - or secret - that women make up the majority of the world's poor and that women are being hardest hit by the financial crisis” laments Philippa Wilitts on the F-word blog (6)
Perhaps, the inequality of the Occupy protests is best represented in the YouTube video 'Hot Chicks on Wall Street” an amateur documentary that the maker claims is “Pics of hot chicks being all protesty.” While many (mostly men) within the movement, including the maker himself have defended the film, Rebecca Traister sums up the crux of the argument “This video is sexist. It’s an example of women participating in public life — political, professional, social — and having their participation reduced to sexual objectification. That’s what happened here, nothing more, nothing less.”(7)
In response to this full spectrum of attacks on women, websites like “Occupy Patriarchy” have sprung up. The aim being to “provide a supportive, global space for feminist analysis, response and organizing and networking within the world-wide Occupy movement.”
“It is our observation that institutions such as Wall Street are manifestations of the far deeper and greater problem of patriarchy which depends in large measure on the exploitation, disempowerment, and subjugation of women, yet (as is all too often the case in progressive movements) the analysis of issues presented so far has shown little effort in looking at the various issues discussed from a feminist vantage point, including but not limited to the following:
Women make up the overwhelming majority of people living in poverty and do the overwhelming majority of unpaid work on which everyone’s lives depend.
Our reproductive rights and agency are continually under siege.
The overwhelming number of victims of sexual exploitation and violence are women and this exploitation intensifies under conditions of economic devastation.
While these issues impact all women, women of color are far more likely to suffer the consequences of patriarchal domination.”
It is sad, but perhaps not unusual, that a movement which is supposed to stand for egalitarian aims has in fact perpetuated many of the inequalities which exist in society. Real social change can only occur when those that are most marginalized and oppressed, the real 99% of society, are empowered by a movement. However in the case of occupy it seems that once again the status quo is being maintained and it is still the privileged few whose voices are being heard. Until this is seriously addressed, no radical system change can occur as a product of this movement.
"Every organization, every movement, struggles with acknowledging systematic oppression. Movements that deny racism, movements that deny sexism; movements that are completely unaccountable to the very people they claim to be liberating; these movements will fail. Again and again, we have witnessed their failure." (9)
References:
(1)Open letter from Glasgow Women's Activist Forum to Occupy Glasgow http://www.indymediascotland.org/node/25722
(2) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-15462443,
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20122659-504083.htm
http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2011/10/24/accusations-of-teen-runaway-sexual-activity-at-occupy-dallas/
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2011/oct/25/occupy-lawrence-members-report-crimes-south-park-c/
http://blogtown.portlandmercury.com/BlogtownPDX/archives/2011/10/09/sexual-assault-reported-at-occupy-portland-camp)
(3) "Dichotomy of Ideals" http://www.spinifexpress.com.au/Blog/display/id=56/comments=show/
(4) "Are Women safe at Occupy Protests?" http://crayfisher.wordpress.com/2011/10/31/are-women-safe-at-occupy-protests/
(5)"Justified Rage from an Unsafe Space: Reflections on Occupy Wallstreet" http://www.peopleofcolororganize.com/activism/organizing/justified-rage-unsafe-space-reflection-occupy-wall-street/
(6)"We are the 49%?" http://www.thefword.org.uk/blog/2011/10/we_are_the_49
(7) Feministe website http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2011/10/14/hot-chicks-of-occupy-wall-street/
(8) Occupy Patriarchy website http://occupypatriarchy.org
(9)"Justified Rage from an Unsafe Space: Reflections on Occupy Wallstreet" http://www.peopleofcolororganize.com/activism/organizing/justified-rage-unsafe-space-reflection-occupy-wall-street/
This article also available from http://edinburghanarchafeminist.noflag.org.uk
By namaskar

Comments
Re: Occupy Patriarchy! A feminist critique of the protests
By Anonymous
thank you so much for writing and posting this.
i am a long term activist and anarchist. over 15 years working, getting arrested, the works.
in evian at the g8 protests, while camping in a large mixed-gender group of fellow activists, i was sexually assaulted. i had been asleep until he entered my tent. of the few activists willing to accept my truth rather than just deny it (effectively calling me a liar) only one asked how i was or what i wanted to happen next, the rest just wanted to beat him up. when i refused to identify him for them to bash they lost all interest immediately.
when i spoke out this summer about having been raped by a man who is prominent in the london anarchist scene i got a much better reaction from those around me. not unanimously, but from a significant number (of women and queers). the men are still not willing to engage about it but nonetheless i give credit to those who have.
however he continues to be a part of the scene, continues to be popular, and the myth continues that these are one-off isolated incidents rather than part of a widespread misogynist rape culture in our scene/movement(s).
i live in london but i have not gone near the occupy protests since they welcomed assange with such loud cheers on their opening weekend. i have no doubt that rape culture will be as prevalent there as it is elsewhere and am not willing to risk my emotional and/or physical safety.
Re: Occupy Patriarchy! A feminist critique of the protests
By Anonymous
"...surely we don't need any more divisions..."
I very much agree -- and it is HIGHLY divisive to the movement to allow sexual attacks on women (and others) to continue unchallenged. This must be dealt with vigorous and immediately.
Re: Occupy Patriarchy! A feminist critique of the protests
By namaskar
I feel it is important to point out that the poster (in the original article above and the source of much contention) being referenced in several people's posts is not from the Occupy Patriarchy website as has been suggested. It is taken from a different blog (original source: https://radicalhub.wordpress.com/2011/10/22/feminist-call-to-action-occu... ) and is included in the post as an example of one of many reactions and challenges to sexism that people have experienced. It is not intended to represent anybodies view point other than the original creator's.
However, disregarding the huge variety of issues being raised about patriarchal and oppressive behavior within the occupy movement, based on any one expression of discontent, does a gross injustice to the many important issues being raised here and elsewhere by many different people. Selectively picking out points of contension in order to draw attention away from the core issues is a strategy designed to distract, rather than engage, in what is being discussed.
You may also note that the article references a great many different sources (none of which the author is affiliated with) - this is because it is intended to summarise the growing volume of blogs and websites about this subject, rather than advocate any one view in particular (though they are all great sources and very worth reading.)
Nowehere does the article state that the Occupy movement is redundant (though that would make a very interesting article) rather it is simply stated that "Until this [the perpetuation of sexism, classism, racism in the movement] is seriously addressed, no radical system change can occur as a product of this [or any] movement"
If nothing else, please keep posts respectful and be aware that anyone reading this forum could be a survivor of abuse, whatever their gender orientation.
Thanks.
Physical safety is far more important than ideological disputes
By Marianne
The first responsibility and priority of all occupiers, including of course radical feminists, should be to organise good security quickly, as physical safety is far more important than divisive ideological disputes; but a/ the occupations should NOT close, and b/ to say that white men constitute 15% of the 99% is divisive nonsense.
How do those who oppose patriarchy and male sexual violence know, for instance, whether a white male (like myself) was (like myself) a victim of male sexual violence as a child, and at what point does a young man like myself stop being a "child" (someone who sits alongside women, so-to-speak, in radical analysis), and at what point does that child grow into one of this "15%"... and WHO gets to say when these dividing lines are drawn? Should those of us who've been victims of violence go around wearing T-shirts that advertise the fact that, in that respect, we're not like other men? And shall we have a debate that divides women on grounds of whether they're middle or working-class, because that'll cut the 51% down to less than 25% straight away!!
Yes women have been victimised and that's extremely serious, but anyone who seeks to divide the occupations along lines of gender or ethnicity does not understand the fundamental idea behind the 99% concept, and arguably should never have been involved in these protests. Women who are concerned their safety should consider leaving for their own protection - I'm not trying to be cynical, just pragmatic - if you're in danger then common-sense suggests the first recourse is to get out of harm's way immediately, and either way anyone can give support without being present 24/7 and/or after dark.
The Occupy movement is a protest against capitalism and against corporate greed. It is inclusive in the sense that it seeks to welcome everybody, but it is NOT inclusive in the sense that it can reasonably expected to resolve all differences or address all grievances and issues - and anyone who thinks that it should is naive, is missing the point completely, and will INEVITABLY divide the Occupations.
Re: Occupy Patriarchy! A feminist critique of the protests
By Anonymous
"The presence of Julian Assange, a man facing allegations of rape and sexual violence, at an Occupy London rally, furthur reinforces that age old tendency to put women's issues to one side in the name of so-called social justice"
<sarcasm>Absolutely, that age old tendancy of innocent until proven guilty needs to go. Everyone knows that people who are accused of a crime are guilty. That innocence project in the US poking holes in the justice system is just a bunch of patriarchal troublemakers </sarcasm>
Re: Occupy Patriarchy! A feminist critique of the protests
By Anonymous
These comments are telling or trolling.
The first would be laughable were it not about so serious an issue:
>I can understand and sympathise but surely we don't need any more divisions, we are already >divided and ruled over by the now famous 1%.
It's a joke, right? See this is the kind of shallow bollocks that he 99% rhetoric produces. The whole 1% message is quite obviously a load of bollocks - first because the middle classes screw us over just as much - and second, because oppression comes in various guises, like patriarchy and racism.
If you're ready to ignore this serious violence then you're an oppressor and you aint part of my fucking revolution.
Thanks to the author(s) for bringing these stories to our attention and for writing an eloquent response.
Re: Occupy Patriarchy! A feminist critique of the protests
By socially status
just to point out on the matter of social status, this is an endemic problem, not confined to any one category. its a virtual cliche in fact, that to really prosper in the radical protest left, you still need a family background in the venerable professions, eg clergy, academia, trades unions etc. the idea that all or any are equal is illusory.
pinch of salt
By Anonymous
How can one individual be attacked by another in a crowded place without anyone stepping in to help? What sort of people occupy these camps? The sort of people who turn a blind eye to injustice? I don't think so! I think some miss information is being banded about here.
Re: Occupy Patriarchy! A feminist critique of the protests
By Anonymous
I can understand and sympathise but surely we don't need any more divisions, we are already divided and ruled over by the now famous 1%. Not all white males are predators.
Woman that wanna take part in these demonstrations should make sure that they have some security, in the form of whatever colour of breed of male of female, folks who can look after themselves.
I remember the advent of "wimmin" on the squatting scene in the 70's, they were a real pain the butt. I once opened a squat for a bunch of them, but when I dropped round to visit a Spanish Girl (she asked me to call by and pick her up) who was staying there, they had to have a meeting to decide whether or not I could come into "their" house. Needless to say I never made it over the threshold. The Spanish girl, moved out pretty damned rapido stylee .
Re: Occupy Patriarchy! A feminist critique of the protests
By Anonymous
look i'm not a troll ok, i have been in involved in loads of queer feminist anti fascist stuff for years as well, which does'st make me perfect but i know wats ok and wats not.....
Jus give it a rest ok, its rubbish sitting behind a computer complaining about this and that.
Your not gonna change most peoples attitudes with an open letter.
these people are trying to do somthing they think is good, go and give em a work shop if u llike but sitting at a desk writing about how your the 99 per cent is jus stuphid!
u can turn that anyway around....as in URE NOT the 99percent AS U HAVE A COMUPTER
or
URE NOT THE 99percent as you live in scotland
sorry i jus hate internet based critisim of new types of action. so there not perfect, help em dont lecture them about feminism
sorry maybe i am being a jack ass i jus wanna see old timery activists helping these people not critisiing them for being messed up by a messed up world